ESG Disclosure and Firm Value in Emerging Markets: Separating Substance from Strategy

Pushpender Singh

Abstract

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosure has grown from a niche investor concern into a mainstream corporate practice, with emerging market firms increasingly joining the wave. But adoption alone tells us little. The more pressing question is whether ESG disclosure in emerging economies actually creates firm value, or whether it is largely a signaling exercise that firms use to satisfy institutional expectations or sidestep regulatory obligations elsewhere. This paper examines that question by drawing on signaling theory, institutional theory, and a growing body of empirical evidence from emerging markets across Asia, Latin America, and Africa. Through three analytical lenses, namely value creation, institutional signaling, and regulatory arbitrage, the paper unpacks the mechanics of how ESG disclosure operates in low-governance environments. Real-world corporate cases from India, China, Brazil, and South Africa illustrate where trust deficits emerge between firms and their stakeholders. The paper concludes with a set of practical advisories for corporate managers tasked with implementing or overseeing ESG-related obligations inside their organizations.

Keywords

ESG disclosure, emerging markets, firm value, institutional signaling, regulatory arbitrage, corporate governance, trust deficit

Full Text:

PDF

References

Bhasin, M. L. (2013). Corporate accounting scandal at Satyam: A case study of India's Enron. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 1(12), 25-47.

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizations. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Dyck, A., Lins, K. V., Roth, L., & Wagner, H. F. (2019). Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 131(3), 693-714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.08.013

Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984

Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917

Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012). What drives corporate social responsibility? The role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(9), 834-864. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2012.26

Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2017). Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785-1824. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12505

Marquis, C., & Qian, C. (2014). Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance? Organization Science, 25(1), 127-148. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0837

Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010

United States Department of Justice. (2016). Volkswagen AG agrees to plead guilty and pay $4.3 billion in criminal and civil penalties for long-running emissions cheating scheme on its diesel vehicles. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/volkswagen-ag-agrees-plead-guilty-and-pay-43-billion-criminal-and-civil-penalties

Van Zyl, J. (2018). Steinhoff: A corporate governance failure. South African Journal of Accounting Research, 32(2-3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10291954.2018.1516327


Be a part of worldclass research: Publish with us