SCHOLEDGE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & DEVELOPMENT
VOL. 2, ISSUE 6 (JUNE2015) ISSN-2394-3378
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INVESTMENT AUDIT- A TOOL FOR RISK MANAGEMENT OF WEALTH- EMPIRICAL STUDY
Christophe Nixon
Visiting Professor
Imperial Colledge of New Zealand
NEW ZEALAND.
ABSTRACT
The fundamental target of this exploration is to see whether there is any crevice between the hypothetical ideas contemplated and broke down, and its usage. Practically speaking, matters are constantly minimal diverse, than what it is taught scholastically, or found in writing on any subject. On the other hand, to what degree there is a level of difference in the event of venture examination, in the middle of hypothesis and practice, is endeavored to be resolved, in this exploration.
The past exploration on venture examination talked about in expansive terms, about changes in systems with time; variables to be considered for suitable computation of money streams; and segments of rebate rate. Yet, none of these studies have shed much light on its functional application, which is exactly explored, in this exploration. Specifically, three divisions of speculation examination � target, inputs and procedure, are inspected.
KEYWORDS: Investment Management, Investment Audit, Financial Audit, Investment Analysis
PRESENTATION
In this segment examination work officially done on speculation evaluation process and its different angles has been considered. It will likewise uncover a few components which are truly essential yet at the same time not treated suitably to accomplish viable and unambiguous assessment of capital ventures like swelling and tariff.
Organizations have constrained assets. So as to accomplish the best use and most extreme yield from these assets organizations oblige a component to choose or break down which ventures merit taking and which are definitely not. It is a multifaceted and investigative procedure and numerous former studies on this practice exist.
Various reviews investigating the speculation evaluation procedure have been led now and again. These studies shed light on the adjustments in the utilization of procedures and different practices, which shaped an essential piece of venture evaluation.
An audit of the current writing uncovers that, there have been consistent changes in the systems utilized for venture examination. Distinctive models and routines have been produced for speculation examination and danger investigation. Over the time of time these improvements have been joined into corporate practice. What does this venture evaluation procedure include as found in writing dissected and auxiliary sources giving quantitative information in regards to the same is examined beneath.
ESTIMATION OF FUTURE CASH FLOW
Venture examination obliges point by point income figures as inputs for advanced assessment systems which have been talked about above. For a speculation choice to be considered as fruitful, it must enhance the firm. Such a venture would clearly build the money streams of the firm, yet what amount? At this point, the firm stands up to the issue of evaluating the future income, venture cost and money inflows radiating from any new venture, and figuring out whether it enhances the firm or not. Considering the instance of Alaska pipeline venture setup by numerous oil majors, at first its cost was evaluated to be $700 million. The last cost, on the other hand, turned out to be $7 billion. This shows estimation of venture money streams is a standout amongst the most imperative and basic parts of speculation evaluation, on the grounds that in the event that these appraisals end up being problematic or one-sided, the undertaking would prompt poor business choices. There are numerous variables included and various individuals partake in this activity. Capital expenses are evaluated by building and item advancement offices; income projections are conveyed by the promoting division; and working expenses is total of assessments given by number of offices like creation individuals, cost bookkeepers, buy chiefs, faculty officials, charge specialists and others (Chandra, 2008: 304). To gauge the conceivable future qualities, past occasions are by and large utilized as a part of request to appraise what could be the future result or results for the same or comparative sort of occasion.
Prior, the most ordinary strategy was to discover the best gauge from the data accessible. This evaluation is for the most part the single quality inferred, utilizing the mode or normal, or a comparable likely result. In any case, assessments taking into account the single worth appraisals, demonstrate that the evaluated quality is sure, with no conceivable safety buffer or fluctuation. Thus, as opposed to utilizing a solitary esteem as the best gauge, another approach of utilizing a scope of results, is utilized. These results are in view of the probabilities of event or non event of occasions, which influence the money streams (Dayananda, 36: 2002).
STAGES IN CASH FLOW ESTIMATION
As indicated by Dayananda (2002) income estimation involves four stages:
Guaging the beginning capital costs and working money inflows and surges.
Duty component, which is an essential component to be balanced against these money streams.
There are sure different variables separated from duty like swelling, open door expense and deterioration and so on which should be weighed keeping in mind the end goal to discover its effect on money streams.
Apportioning any further assets keeping in mind the end goal to enhance the exactness and unwavering quality of the variables which have most prominent impact on income gauge.
This whole process obliges close observing and early intercession, when needed. Checking is needed at all stages from information securing procedure to extend's usage (Dayananda, 2002: 37 - 39 � capital planning: budgetary examination of venture activities).
EVALUATING INCREMENTAL CASH FLOWS FOR INVESTMENT APRAISAL
The basic guideline for the consideration of money streams with the end goal of venture evaluation is to incorporate just the incremental money streams. This alludes to the income incepted after the usage of the undertaking. The time when the venture is made, is considered as time 0, and the money streams produced after time 0 constitutes a piece of the incremental income. For finding out the company's incremental income, it is obliged to distinguish the income of the firm in two circumstances i.e. with the venture and without the undertaking. The distinction between the two gives the incremental money streams. In evaluating incremental income every single coincidental impact are additionally considered. Accidental impacts lead to an upgrade in the estimation of some current exercises, for example, an ascent in the interest of a current item. Be that as it may, accidental impacts might likewise end up being negative like item cannibalization i.e. with the presentation of another item, the offer of some current items may decay (Arnold, 2008: 99-100; Chandra, 2008: 307-308).
OPPORTUNITY COSTS AND SUNK COSTS
There are additionally sure viewpoints which are not clearly identified and should be dealt with in the valuation of expense of capital. Opportunity expenses and sunk expenses are the two sorts of expenses which fall under this classification. Opportunity expense is the income lost by utilizing the assets framing piece of the undertaking, under thought. These assets may be leased or sold, or utilized somewhere else. The sunk expense is the expense which the firm has effectively caused, and has no impact on present or future choices. It is the past expense which was brought about previously, and is gone independent of the certainty, whether the organization acknowledges the task or not.
Besides, Rustagi (2005) grouped the money streams connected with an undertaking as unique or introductory money surge, ensuing money inflows and outpourings, and terminal income.
BEGINNING CASH OUTFLOWS, SUBSEQUENT CASH FLOWS, AND TERMINAL CASH FLOWS
Unique or introductory money outpouring is the starting venture, happening toward the start of the task. This is obliged to get the undertaking operational. Since the venture expense happens to start with of the task, it is anything but difficult to recognize the beginning money outpouring. It incorporates the securing of advantages like hardware, building, innovation and so forth. Alongside the expense of advantages, other coincidental expenses should likewise be considered, similar to the expense of transportation and establishment. Sunk expenses and opportunity costs as talked about above are additionally a piece of this.
Ensuing money inflows and surges are created after the starting cost of capital. The venture is relied upon to create a progression of money inflows, through the task that has been started. These inflows may be the same consistently or may fluctuate starting with one year then onto the next all through the lifespan of the venture. Notwithstanding inflows, capital planning choices additionally consider the consequent outpourings, that may be needed for intermittent repairs or support.
The third grouping is the terminal money inflows. These are the trade inflows in for money the most recent year. Firstly, this would incorporate the scrap worth, or the rescue estimation of the task, which is feasible toward the end of the financial life. The second, is the working capital which gets discharged toward the finishing of the task. This is once more, made accessible to the firm.
Estimation of money streams as a measure of the expense and advantages of any task, incorporates these three types of money streams, and structures the piece of any great procedure to assess a proposition (Rustagi, 2005: 486 - 489).
Notwithstanding every one of these variables, money streams likewise get influenced by the components which are unrealistic to be unequivocally anticipated, and continues changing with time, similar to expansion and charges.
TREATMENT OF INFLATION
Expansion has an immediate effect on the last result of speculation examinations. It influences both the future money streams, and expense of capital. On the off chance that swelling is not appropriately balanced, the future money streams are expanded, well beyond, what they would be. For the conformity of expansion, money streams must be either introduced in the genuine terms or cash (ostensible) terms.
ALTERATION OF FUTURE CASH FLOWS IN REAL AND MONEY TERMS
In genuine terms, future trade streams are balanced in for cold hard currency terms of today's present acquiring influence, and in cash terms income is balanced, by obtaining force, at the time they happen. For applying the right treatment, organizations are obliged to markdown the genuine money streams at the genuine rebate rate, and ostensible money streams at ostensible markdown rates (Drayery and Tayles, 1997). According to Carsberg and Hope (1976) in Arnold and Hatzopoulos (2000) the organizations prior, balanced for expansion in a fairly unseemly way. Organizations have been either evaluating the future trade streams in for money ostensible terms. With the end goal of marking down, they have utilized genuine rate of return. Then again, they have been assessing the future trade streams in for money genuine value terms, yet reduced at the cash rebate rate. There is a noteworthy change in this practice from the most recent two decades (Arnold and Hatzopoulos, 2000: 12). However rather than this, as per the information gathered by Drayery and Tayles, 1997 There are still a lion's share of firms, treating the issue of expansion, mistakenly. The study was directed on 195 organizations in UK,out of which just 53 or 27% are doing the right treatment of swelling, with respect to future money streams (Data connected in informative supplement 1).
BASIC MISTAKES IN THE ADJUSTMENT OF INFLATION
Subsequently, we can see that the conformity for the treatment of expansion, with respect to future money streams and relative rebate rates, is not an exceptionally phenomenal error. The most well-known misstep is utilizing the cash rebate rate of return for marking down the income gauges, accessible as far as genuine costs. This prompts the undervaluation of NPV, prompting the dismissal of the task now and again, which merit undertaking, yet, are most certainly not. If there should be an occurrence of the opposite situation, the outcome would be overvaluation of the NPV, prompting the disappointment of tasks over the long haul. Long haul undertakings, are more inclined to this sort of confound, on the grounds that with a more extended time period, the variety in real money streams, because of avoidance of swelling, gets exacerbated. The money streams gathered after numerous years, are esteemed in current terms, and that ends up being profoundly misshaped. In the event of transient ventures, regardless of the possibility that expansion has not been incorporated, the bending in the estimations of future money streams, is not high (Drayery and Tayles, 1997: 3).
TREATMENT OF TAXES
Charges have an immediate and significant effect, on the undertaking feasibility. For a complete venture examination, it is critical to consider the complete levy suggestions, over the money streams. It is key with the end goal of venture evaluation, to consider the money streams subsequent to paying charges, following just these are accessible to shareholders. There are numerous critical perspectives to be viewed as, with respect to levy.
As indicated by Arnold (2008) if the expense liabilities of the firm gets expanded because of the venture, then the expanded duty impacts must be fused in the investigation, to achieve the real income figure. Besides, expenses are not for the most part paid around the same time in which they happen. Organizations pay a piece of the present year's assessments and a piece of the collected charges, which must be considered as needs be. The time element must be effectively represented, while examining the money outpouring of charges.
As indicated by Rohrich (2007), because of the speculation, duty would emerge and NPV must be computed when levy. The ramifications of assessment would influence the NPV extensively. Firstly with expenses, income will decay thus will the NPV computed out of that income. Besides, the capital structure of the undertaking additionally brings about the decrease in rebate rate, with an increment in adapting proportion. Since the enthusiasm on obligation is expense deductible, it decreases the expense of capital, and therefore prompts fall in the markdown rate. Other than these Lumby (1988) has additionally tossed light on one more critical perspective. This is the arrangement of recording parities, which likewise gives charge alleviation on capital use. Accordingly, the net impact of the assessment could be seen as a decrease in NPV, because of an abatement in real money streams, on one hand. Then again there was an increment in NPV, because of a lessening in rebate rates.
EXPENSE OF CAPITAL
The expense of capital is the rate of return that an organization brings to the table account suppliers to incite them to purchase and hold a monetary security. This rate is controlled by the profits offered on option securities with the same danger (Arnold, 2008: 717).
The definition given demonstrates that the rate of profit for the capital, is the thing that decides its cost. This rate of return is the rebate rate utilized by the organizations. In the event that it is assessed higher than what really it ought to be, then it obliges the ventures. Like Arnold (2008) has cited Michael Haseltine, one time President of the Board of Trade Organizations are not sufficiently contributing on account of their over the top desires of venture returns (Arnold, 2008: 717).
HIGH RATE OF RETURN
As indicated by Ashford et al. (1988) organizations utilize extensively high markdown rate than needed, according to the open door expense of capital. The explanation behind this, is the danger premium which organizations apply, particularly if there should be an occurrence of speculations made in the ventures utilizing new innovation. Such undertakings are thought to be more unverifiable, so the rebate rate is higher than in different speculations (Ashford et al., 1988: 2). Arnold and Hatzopoulos (2000) have cited Antle and Appen (1985) and Antle and Fellingham (1990) that directors so as to keep a strict control over corporate assets and to lessen the propensity to over contribute, keep high rebate rates (Arnold and Hatzopoulos, 2000). So also as per Dimson and Marsh (1994) in Drury and Tayles (1996) organizations in UK utilize too much high rebate rates, which thusly, have prompted the under-interest in UK firms.
In USA as well, firms utilization obstacle rates for undertaking assessment, which are higher than their evaluated expense of capital (Drury and Tayles, 1996: 12).
WACC
So as to pull in financial specialists, organizations need to give returns, higher than the open door expense of capital. Organizations utilize a standard intends to express their expense of capital, utilizing weighted normal expense of capital (WACC). As per Bruner et al (1998) WACC is the system utilized by the vast majority of the organizations, counselors and even course books, as a strategy to infer the markdown rate utilized as the expense of capital. Bierman (1993) led review in which 74 Fortune 100 organizations took part. The outcomes got demonstrated that every one of the organizations utilize some type of marking down in their capital planning, and 93% utilization a weighted-normal expense of capital (Bruner et al, 1998: 2-3). Arnold and Hatzopoulos (2000) exhibited data given by Westwick and Shohet (1976) expressing that organization's bank overdraft rate was the most famous strategy among UK organizations for selecting the rate of come back to be utilized for assessing capital venture. In the meantime WACC was by and by under 10% of firms. Be that as it may, this pattern changed generously over the time of time and as indicated by the information gathered by Arnold and Hatzopoulos (2000) more than a large portion of the organizations use WACC to figure the expense of capital (results joined in addendum 2). Notwithstanding this, it is likewise prominent that still noteworthy minority firms utilization interest rate payable on obligation as a measuring apparatus to compute the expense of capital (Arnold and Hatzopoulos, 2000: 17).
For ascertaining the WACC an organization needs to get data about the expense of different wellsprings of capital and their extents in the capital structure. Considering that we have two wellsprings of accounts i.e. value and obligation, here expense of capital is controlled by the recipe:
WACC = KEWE + KDWD
Here, KE = expense of value
KD = expense of obligation
WE = extent of value fund to aggregate money
WD = extent of obligation fund to aggregate money
EXPENSE OF DEBT
Obligation involves to pretty much altered installments, so assessing the expense of obligation is generally simple. Arnold (2008) has secured three variables which focus the expense of obligation, these are:
1. Existing rate of enthusiasm on obligation capital.
2. The danger of default by the account holder and recuperation rate or risks in the event of default.
3. Advantage got from obligation capital because of the duty shield.
EXPENSE OF EQUITY
While the estimation of expense of obligation is simple, the expense of value is fairly hard to gauge. This is because of the way that organizations don't have any dedication towards the shareholders to pay profits. On the other hand, organizations have been coming to some sensibly great appraisals of the expense of value utilizing some predominant procedures like Capital resource estimating model. Albeit, a few organizations notice different models too like arbitrage evaluating hypothesis however these are in little extent. Another model which was most powerful in 1960s was Gordon development model. Then again, there was an issue of acquiring a solid evaluation of future development rate of profits in this model. This was gotten equitably utilizing past information which was not thought to be a reliable evaluation (Arnold, 2008: 726).
As indicated by Bruner et al. CAPM is the most famously utilized model for evaluating the expense of value. In a wide study led by Trahan and Gitman (1995) of 84 fortune 500 huge firms and best little Forbes 200 organizations it was found that 30% of respondents utilize the capital resource estimating model. Also, in a review directed in Australia, CAPM is the most usually utilized system as a part of assessing the expense of value, with 72% of the organizations under study, utilizing this model (Truong et al., 2006: 3).
To finish up, what can be seen is the outcome coaxed out of study on the corporate expense of capital and the arrival on corporate venture. This shows normal corporate speculation delivered returns that surpass the expense of capital. This is dissected for the time of 1950-96, the genuine expense of capital for non-money related firms is high, 5.95 percent. The genuine profit for expense is higher, 7.38 percent therefore by and large speculation is by all accounts productive (Fama and French, 1999).
BREAKING DOWN THE LEVEL OF USAGE OF APPRAISAL TECHNIQUES
Since decades organizations have been in constant hunt of dependable venture evaluation procedures. These strategies serves to rank the different contending ventures on the premise of advantages that can be determined out of every one as against the expenses acquired over the same.
CUSTOMARY METHODS
The primary examination contemplated here is the review directed by Arnold and Hatzopoulos in the year 1997. The study looks at the level of use of four fundamental traditional examination systems � payback technique, bookkeeping rate of return (ARR), inward rate of return (IRR) and net present quality (NPV). 300 organizations are overviewed which are positioned in the Times 1000 organizations as indicated by capital utilized (results joined in reference section 4). This study is additionally contrasted and two past studies one is by Pike covering the period from 1975 to 1992; and Alkaraan and Northcott for the year 2002. These are decided for correlation on account of comparable attributes in all the three reviews. As indicated by the outcomes, it is clear that payback system has been the most broadly utilized strategy till mid 1990s when contrasted with reduced income techniques � IRR and NPV. Nonetheless, from there on ascend in the utilization of NPV can be seen and with respect to now it turned into the most prominent examination method. Yet, this was not to the detriment of a decrease in the use of the payback system. Indeed, even payback strategy is utilized a considerable amount alongside different techniques.
As indicated by the study directed by Alkaraan and Northcott, 2002, every one of the four strategies is utilized widely. Notwithstanding this, it is clearly evident as which are the two most prevalent systems utilized by every one of the organizations under overview � the payback technique which is utilized by 96% of the organizations and NPV which is utilized by 99% of the organizations.
This additionally demonstrates the pattern of utilizing more than one system by the organizations keeping in mind the end goal to guarantee the venture attempted is right. On this Arnold and Hatzopoulos (2000) has found that in 1975 33% of substantial firms utilized just single system; 33% utilized two routines with most extreme number utilizing payback and ARR; and payback and IRR; and staying 33% utilized three or four techniques (results joined in informative supplement 5). Though by 1997 there is a noteworthy move in this work on demonstrating 67% of firms (76% of expansive firms) utilizing three or four systems. In this 29% of the considerable number of firms utilized every one of the four techniques settling on it the most well known decision took after by mix of payback, IRR and NPV.
In spite of the fact that the payback system is not thought to be excessively advanced still it is utilized widely in light of its effortlessness. In addition, it is not utilized as the essential evaluation system. Maybe it is utilized as an optional strategy, which bolsters the other more complex strategies (Arnold, 2008; Ashford et al, 1988).
SIZE OF THE ORGANIZATION AS A CRITERION FOR CHOOSING AN EXAMINATION TECHNIQUE
In a comparable overview by Drury and Tayles in UK on an extensive variety of associations of distinctive sizes, comparative results were discovered (results joined in Appendix 6). Marked down income strategies are utilized a great deal more broadly than the payback system, which was the most widely recognized technique, utilized already (Drury and Tayles, 1997: 2).
In the meantime, rather than this, there was another perspective point which was communicated. As per Lefley, 1994 in his investigation of substantial UK assembling firms 94% of the organizations use payback method making it the most prominent strategy and 69% utilization either IRR or NPV (Alkaraan and Northcott, 2006). According to Drury and Tayles (1997) with respect to which strategy is thought to be the most essential demonstrates that to be the payback system. This was trailed by the IRR. Then again, there is change of supposition, in light of the extent of associations.
For this situation specialists found that IRR is the most vital procedure for bigger associations. This was trailed by, the payback strategy and instinctive judgment being the slightest critical. On account of littler associations, the payback system is positioned as the most critical, and natural judgment as the second generally vital.
The overview directed by Arnold and Hatzopoulos, 2000 which is separated on the premise of size of the association, demonstrates that NPV is more prominent on account of substantial and medium scale associations. Yet, not in the situation of little scale organizations. Peel and Wilson (1996) additionally found that 67.6% of firms in a specimen of ventures utilizing 50 individuals or less, have been discovered utilizing the payback system, while in Austin et al. (1994) the main quantitative choice measure utilized by any firm was the payback technique (Ekanem and smallbone, 2007).
Besides, in Australia as per Truong et al (2008) in a late worldwide study which included Australian organizations, showed that marked down income systems for venture evaluation, were discovered to be most mainstream with 73% of the overviewed organizations, utilizing every one of these approachs (Truong at al, 2008: 3).
WEAKNESSES OF DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW METHODS.
Reduced income strategies, are the most prevalent among every one of the systems utilized for venture examination. Yet, there are still a few weaknesses connected with it.
VENTURES WITH LONG INITIATION TIME AND RECOVERY TIME
Firstly, a few ventures have a longest-start time and a long recuperation period like force era organizations, which take up development time of over three years, with a normal existence of over 25 years. In the NPV system, markdown rates are figured, keeping the danger level as one of the impressive components. If there should be an occurrence of ventures like these, and the presence of an exceptionally focused business environment, the danger level shifts. Yet, it is impractical to change the rebate component, for arranging the whole existence of the venture. Along these lines, the consistent danger measure is an unseemly measure, in surveying the reasonability of a venture. Besides, marked down income routines, are in view of assessed future money streams, which might likewise fluctuate because of the progressions. Because of longer span of task changes are all that much prone to occur. This would make the essential NPV assessments invalid (Lu et. al., 2006: 2).
Arnold and Hatzopoulos (2000) likewise have concluded from their discoveries of a review led by them that standard NPV is not able to catch the intricacy of corporate venture choices (Arnold and Hatzopoulos, 2000: 9).
DELICATE PROJECTS
The reduced income systems are additionally condemned for their improper examination of delicate undertakings, for example, innovative work (R&D) and Information correspondence innovation (ICT). Thus the administration needed to choose such tasks on the grounds of instinctive judgment, experience and dependable guideline techniques (Akalu, 2003: 2)
WORKING FLEXIBILITY AND STRATEGIC VALUE OF PROJECT
So also, as per Schwartz and Trigeorgis, (2004) there are two fundamental viewpoints which are not secured in NPV examination. Firstly, it is the working adaptability which gives an alternative to the administration, to reevaluate their choice. Furthermore, it is the key estimation of the task, which may fluctuate in future in light of other reliant activities, or other aggressive variables. Since these two viewpoints are absent in the NPV strategy, it may result to the misevaluation of undertakings.
To conquer this issue, the administration obliges adaptability to change its choice, as indicated by the adjustments later on environment. Such unforeseen changes would either convey more positive result because of the ascent in NPV or the other way around. Such adaptability can be accomplished by utilizing genuine alternatives (Scwartz and Trigeorgis, 2004: 79).
GENUINE OPTIONS
Helen Weeds has clarified this as When a firm has the chance to make an irreversible speculation confronting future vulnerability there is a choice estimation of postponement (Weeds H., 2001: 1). The strategy for task examination leaves the director with the alternative of either to acknowledge the venture at this time, or to reject it for whatever the most substantial reason. Be that as it may, genuine choices make it feasible for supervisors to change their choice to suit evolving circumstances.
According to the extended NPV manage as given by Scwartz and Trigeorgis, (2004) asymmetry, brought by the unforeseen changes, makes it imperative to utilize both the customary or starting NPV of direct money streams, and a premium for the adaptability, which can be determined utilizing the working alternatives, along these lines
Extended NPV = Static NPV + alternative premium.
CONCLUSION
Here, the point talked about is that, keeping in mind the end goal to beat the downside of NPV because of unverifiable future occasions, genuine choices are being utilized by the organizations. These alternatives are much the same as the call choices on stocks, with a distinction that these are the choices on genuine resources. It is much the same as how the proprietor of a call alternative on stocks, has the watchfulness to purchase the stocks inside of the stipulated time period still it is not under any commitment to purchase. Correspondingly, the organizations can embrace comparative optional speculation opportunities, and have right to profit by it. Yet, it is not under any commitment to gain the present estimation of expected money streams, by making a speculation expense at the latest the foreseen date.
With all these distinctive overviews and discoveries, we can't locate any predictable result in regards to the use of any specific procedure. Still, the greater part of the exploration discoveries can be thought to be supportive of reduced income strategies, particularly on account of extensive associations.
REFERENCES
Annual Reports Of The Central Bank Of The Republic Of Armenia, 1998-2005.
Avanesyan K. Problems Of State Reserve Management In RA, Ph.D. Thesis, Yerevan 2002.
Barajas A. Asset Allocation And Diversification. IMF Institute, Sept. 2004, Vienna, Austria.
Bodie Z., Kane A., Marcus A. J. Investments (6th Ed.). Mcgraw-Hill, NY USA 2005.
Fabozzi F. J. Financial Instuments. John Wiley & Sons, NJ USA 2002.
Fama E., Macbeth J. Risk, Return And Equilibrium: Empirical Tests, The Journal Of Political Economy 1973.
Friend I., Blume M. E. The Demand For Risky Assets, American Economic Review Vol. 65, No.
5, Dec. 1975.
Galstyan M. Management Of International Reserves And The Foreign Exchange Rate, Ph.D. Thesis, Yerevan 2003.
Markowitz H. Portfolio Selection, Journal Of Finance Vol. 7, No. 1, March 1952.
Markowitz H. The Optimization Of A Quadratic Function Subject To Linear Constraints, Naval
Research Logistics Quarterly Vol. 3, No. 1-2, March-June 1956.
Nugee J. Foreign Exchange Reserves Management, Bank Of England Centre For Central Banking Studies, Handbook No. 19, Nov. 2000.
Pindyck R. Risk Aversion And Determinants Of Stock Market Behavior, NBER Working Paper
No. 1921, May 1986.
Schooley D., Worden D. D. Risk Aversion Measures: Comparing Attitudes And Asset
Allocation, Financial Services Review 5(2), 1996; P. 98.
Sharpe W. F., Alexander G. J. Investments (4th Ed.). Prentice-Hall, Inc., NJ USA 1990. The International Reserve Management Strategy Of The Central Bank Of The Republic Of Armenia.
The Republic Of Armenia Law On The Central Bank Of The Republic Of Armenia (Adopted
30.06.1996, Amended And Revised).
� Scholedge Publishing Inc., 2015.
